Comparison

Tarmac vs Conductor

Conductor and Tarmac both put Claude Code and Codex in one window, but they answer different questions. Conductor is built to run several agents in parallel, each in its own workspace, then review and merge their work. Tarmac is built to see and run every local project, with the agents' sessions next to the apps they build.

In short
  • Conductor is the better tool to orchestrate parallel agents: one isolated workspace per agent, review and merge of their changes, Cursor agents too.
  • Tarmac is the better tool to run your projects: every repository in your code folders, free ports that stay the same, logs, Docker, local Supabase, Git explained.
  • Both are Mac-first; Tarmac also runs on Windows through WSL 2.
  • Tarmac is free and open source (MIT).

Feature by feature

Facts about the other tool checked on 6 November 2026, from its official pages. Tools change fast: tell us if something is out of date.

FeatureTarmacConductor
Main jobSee and run every local project, with its agent sessionsRun parallel coding agents and merge their work
Coding agentsClaude Code and CodexClaude Code, Codex and Cursor
Isolation between agentsNo (sessions run in the project folder)Yes, one isolated workspace per agent
Review and merge an agent's changesBuilt-in editor, source control view and Git menuYes, built in
Projects without an agentYes: every project of your code foldersNot its focus
Ports and dev server logsFree port per app, kept between runs; live logs; "Free the ports"Not mentioned on its site
Docker, local SupabaseYesNot mentioned on its site
Plan usage on screenClaude and ChatGPT plans, liveNot mentioned on its site
PlatformsmacOS; Windows through WSL 2Mac
PriceFree and open source (MIT); Pro €49 one-timeSee conductor.build

What Conductor does well

Conductor's promise is in its tagline: run parallel coding agents on your Mac. You create several Claude Code, Codex or Cursor agents, each in an isolated workspace, let them work at the same time, then review and merge their changes. If your day is "five tasks, five agents, then review", that is exactly its job, and it does it with less setup than isolating each agent yourself.

What Tarmac does differently

Tarmac does not orchestrate agents. It lists every project of your code folders and runs them: Start with a free port that stays the same, live logs, a console per project, a Git menu with about thirty commands explained, Docker containers grouped by project and local Supabase instances. The Claude Code and Codex sessions of each project sit next to all that, with your two plans' usage in the sidebar and a task list the agent keeps up to date.

When Conductor is the better choice

Choose Conductor if:

  • you regularly run several agents at once on the same repository and want each isolated;
  • reviewing and merging agents' work is the bottleneck of your day;
  • you use Cursor agents as well.

When Tarmac is the better choice

Choose Tarmac if:

  • you juggle many projects and lose time on ports, logs and "which app is running";
  • your projects need Docker or a local Supabase stack;
  • you want to see both your Claude and ChatGPT plan usage;
  • you want a free, open source tool, or need Windows (WSL 2).

Using both

The two do not conflict: agents running in Conductor's workspaces are processes on your Mac, and the apps they start still need ports. Tarmac keeps the project side in order while Conductor runs the agents.

Frequently asked questions

Is Tarmac a Conductor alternative?

Partly. Both show Claude Code and Codex in one app, but Conductor focuses on running agents in parallel in isolated workspaces, while Tarmac focuses on running your local projects (ports, logs, Docker, Supabase) with the agents' sessions alongside.

Does Tarmac create a worktree per agent?

No. Sessions started from Tarmac run in the project folder. For isolated parallel sessions, Claude Code's claude --worktree or a tool like Conductor fits better.

Does Tarmac support Cursor?

Tarmac runs Claude Code and Codex sessions. It can open any project in Cursor, VS Code, Zed or WebStorm, but it does not run Cursor agents.

Try Tarmac for free

Free and open source, for macOS and Windows (WSL 2). It works next to the tools on this page, not instead of them.

Sources

Conductor is a trademark of its owner. Tarmac is not affiliated with it, nor with Anthropic or OpenAI.

All comparisons